Characteristics of the Social-ecological System Components of Three major Artisanal Fisheries in the North East of Nigeria
PDF

Keywords

Artisanal fisheries
Social-ecological systems
traditional fisheries management
livelihoods

Abstract

This paper presents information needed for the analysis of some of the artisanal fisheries of North East, Nigeria using the social-ecological systems (SES) framework. The information was collected in a study conducted from 1993 to 1996 covering the upper section of the River Benue in Adamawa State, the Nguru-Gashua wetlands in Yobe State, and the western shore of Lake Chad in Borno State. The results confirm the complexity and social-ecological nature of these fisheries. It revealed a widespread lack of centralized government participation in fisheries management even though its institutions have the statutory responsibility for management. The de facto institutions for the management of local fisheries resources were found to be community-based and traditional. They operate a wide range of traditional management systems that have so far maintained the resources on which the communities depend for a livelihood. These traditional institutions were found to be under increasing threats of disappearing as a result of both biophysical and social changes. The study recommends the establishment of monitoring systems to collect trend information and the use of the social-ecological framework for rigorous analysis. It concludes that it is only through this process that adequate understanding needed to implement interventions to prevent the collapse of the systems can be achieved.

PDF

References

Alessa, L., Kliskey A., and Altaweel M. (2009). Toward a typology for social-ecological systems. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 5(1):31-41.

Anderies, J. M. and Janssen, M.A. (2007): Robustness trade-offs in social-ecological systems. International Journal of the Commons 1(1): 77-99.

Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A. and Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of socialecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society. 9(1):18. [Online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/.

Anderies, J. M., Rodriguez, A. A., Janssen, M. A., and Cifdaloz, O.O., (2007). Panaceas, Uncertaintyand Robust Control framework in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A. 104 (39): 15194 – 15199.

Berkes, F., and Farvar, M. T. (1989). Introduction and overview. In: Common property resources: Ecology and community-based sustainable development (Berkes, F., ed) 1-18. Belhaven Press. London. 302Pp.

Cox, M. (2014). Understanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project. International Journal of the Commons 8(2): 265-276.

FAO (2005). Mainstreaming fisheries co-management in the Asia-Pacific. RAP publication 2005/24. FAO, Rome.

Fleischman, F. D., Boenning, K., Gustavo, et al., (2010). Disturbance, response, and persistence in self- organized forest communities: Analysis of robustness and resilience in five communities in Southern Indiana. Ecology and Society 15(4): 9. [Online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art9/.

Folke, C. (2006). Reslience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological system analyses. Global Environmental Change 16(3):253-267.

Glaser, M., Krause, B. R. and Welp M. (2008). Human/Nature interaction in the Anthropocene: Potential of social-ecological system analysis. GAIA 17 (1): 77 – 80. www.oekom.de/gaia

Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S., eds (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington D. C. 507Pp.

Herfindahl, O. C. (1955). Comment on Rosenbluth’s measures of concentration. In: Business Concentration and Price Policy. (Stigler, G., ed.) Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

Janssen, M. A., Bodin, O., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R. J., Olsson, P., and Ryan, P. (2006). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):15. [Online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/.

Krausmann, F., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Schandel, H. and Eisenmenger, N. (2008). The global sociometabolic transition: past and present metabolic profiles and their future trajectories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(5-6):637-656

Liu, J. G., Dietz T., Carpenter, et al., (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems Science 317(5844):1513-1516.

McGinnis, M. D.,and Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society 19(2): 30
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art30/.

Mcleod, K., and Leslie, H. (2009). Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Island Press. Washington D.C. 392Pp.

Neiland, A. E., Sarch, M-T, Madakan, S. P., Ladu, B. M. B. and Jaffry, S., (1997). Characterization of the Inland fisheries of N. E. Nigeria including the Upper River Benue, Lake Chad and the NguruGashua Wetlands. Paper No. 1. TMAF Final Report. CEMARE, University of Portsmouth, U. K.

Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39): 15181 – 15187.

Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic.../laureates/.../ostrom_lecture.pdf

Schoon, M. L., and Cox, M. E. (2012). Understanding disturbance and responses in social-ecological systems. Society and Natural Resources 25(2): 141-155.

Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163:688.

United Nations-Habitat. (2007). State of the world’s cities 2006/7: the millennium development goals and urban sustainability. Earthscan. London. 108Pp.